I can Only Say What You Understand
"Perhaps my plea will awaken the spirit of justice,
seated in every man's heart, if he knows her or knows her not."
If You See Something Say Something
This Should Scare Anybody If They Say I Was Not There
Then The 500 People With Me Were Not There
"We Need To Do Better With Targeting (The Pentagon)"
Will The Elite Class Use This Same Technique To Take Away Your Right To Protect Yourself and Family By Plugging the Loop Holes In The Current
Background Checks For Gun Control?
Several Cases Have Been Presented
Texas Private Investigative Firms
Generate False Intelligence for Profit or Retaliation
One More Reason People Have To Disclose
Generate False Intelligence for Profit or Retaliation
One More Reason People Have To Disclose
On The Web Or In The Media
 |
| Jupiter On Display In A Kentucky Museum O'Dell 2007 |
Why Sequester Federal Agents When You Can Dump Contractors
That Can Be Bought At Any Price and Cost More Than Actual
Trained Agents?
That Can Be Bought At Any Price and Cost More Than Actual
Trained Agents?
*************************
IVERP Makes A Claim That The FBI
Could Not Place Me At These Terrorist
Bombings
1. Saudi Arabia First Federal Build Bombing November 13,1995
In fact, I followed protocol and contacted my local FBI office and they did in fact investigate and acted appropriately.
The OVC stated I could file a complaint against the FBI Office, instead I called them yesterday and they said they would correct it.
Over 40 pages of Federal Documents were received by the office of OVC and I was registered with the State Department in each and every case. Further, I hold an FAA license and have been tracked for the last 25 years.
Why Should I Have To Prove My Whereabouts If They Have Been Tracking me and already have that data?
'Federal Data Manipulation' Is A Problem That Must Be Addressed. 'Beat The VA Backlog' Helpful Information.
Why Should I Have To Prove My Whereabouts If They Have Been Tracking me and already have that data?
'Federal Data Manipulation' Is A Problem That Must Be Addressed. 'Beat The VA Backlog' Helpful Information.
Example:
.jpg)
This Should Scare Anybody If They Say I Was Not There
Then The 500 People With Me Were Not There
"We Need To Do Better With Targeting (The Pentagon)"
Will The Elite Class Use This Same Technique To Take Away Your Right To Protect Yourself and Family By Plugging the Loop Holes In The Current
Background Checks For Gun Control?
The following information has been submitted:
Pete Gallego Congressional Representative District 23
Name: Mr Gregory N O'Dell
Address: 1290 Mc Coy Road, 1290 Mc Coy Road
City/State/Zip: Somerset, TX 78069 3719
E-mail: odellgregory@yahoo.com
Telephone:
Issue: HOM
Message Subject: Federal Data Manipulation
Message Text:
I Am The Victim of Three Terrorist Bombings Reported as per Protocol To ITVERP and the San Antonio FBI. ITVERP Made A Claim That I Was Not In These Locations After Sending In Federal Documents Proving I Was, They stated that the FBI Said I Was Not At Any of These Location But I Was and the Prime eye witnesses to two, one they knew nothing about. Please go to link http://solidstateindependence.blogspot.com/2013/04/fbi-federal-data-manipulation-or-texas.html for some of the documentation and call ITVERP @ 1-800-363-0441 And Have Correct The Information. And take all my claims seriously and process them. Thank you
Would you like a response? Y
G. N.O'Dell 04/11/2013
4 comments:
Google ads offer me a one-way ticket to Juarez Mexico. Let me tell you, I can cross that border anytime and no harm will come to me. The Danger Is ON This Side Of The Border! The subject of deception – Texas Governor Rick Perry created a 500 DMZ Zone between Texas and Mexico City over a ten year period.
April 2009: Mr President please a null the following Department of Education Regulation that was sneaked in under the bureaucratic carpet before you set foot in office!
This public statement on the Gov Reg. page means all students with disabilities will be targeted by unofficial staff breaches. Please reconsider the proposed clarification rules in reference to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act as it relates to the disabled student population at colleges and universities in Texas and across America. There are two agendas promoted by the consortium of higher education known as NCHERM with memberships greater than 500 colleges and university across America: 1. Campus Violence 2. Financial liability. These issues must be addressed separately or dire consequences will result from the push to reduce financial risk by deregulation of privacy laws under the guise to end violent acts on campus. Disabled students may have already been targeted as liability risk by the same law enforcement tool used to identity disturbed students in order to prevent
occurrences such as the “tragic events at Virginia Tech in April 2007.”
The behavior assessment system CUBASS, incorporated on every campus to end violence would benefit most from the purposed deregulation. The privacy rule changes specifically relating to campus safety should go forward immediately. Using the 911 Patriot Act to deregulate privacy laws for campus safety, is a necessary evil, an irritation of privacy for the better good and protection of students. Unfortunately, the medical records of stable students identified on campus disabilities rosters may already been targeted for compromise by “unauthorized access by school officials” solely for financial risk management. The disabled student population is the only minority group segregated and identified on official state rosters and therefore subjects of discrimination by the purposed regulation. The areas of comprise are not limited to, Misrepresentation of Medical records, Mistreatment of the disabled third party business, Denied Access to programs, Reduction in financial aid, Harassment by misguided faculty and staff, Discrimination by campus police, Medical breaches under the guise of academic research.
Could it be that some of the most recent campus unrest could be contributed to mandatory state and university staff instructions which do not address ways to stop or reduce discrimination/ harassment but identifies any student with a legidament ADA disability grievance as a dangerous violent threat? NCHERM is promoting web training in the same context of campus violence and repeatedly uses the same push used as background information by the Department of Education for privacy deregulation; Background “… in light of the tragic events at Virginia Tech in April 2007.” NCHERM promotional ad seems to mix the Virginia Tech tragedy in context of ADA grievances filed by sane intelligent students who by last resort made a plea for help from government agencies, “Since the massacre at Virginia Tech last April, we at NCHERM have grappled with two questions. First, should colleges and universities be in the business of behavioral intervention?” Filing a ligament ADA grievance is not the business of 'Behavioral Intervention' especially if it is used as a financial risk management tool! Please reconsider the dire consequences of regulation changes proposed by
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 34 CFR Part 99 RIN 1855-AA05 Docket ID ED-2008-OPEPD-0002 Family Educational Rights and Privacy
I Answered my own question:
Sketch of the History of Legal & Political Anthropology
1860s-1890s Maine advances evolutionary approach. This along with
Lewis Henry Morgan’s study of the Iriquois League (1851) can be considered as the starting point of both domains.
James Mooney’s study of political rebellion among the Sioux and how they were massacred by the US military forces stands as a lonesome critique to the dominant progressive evolutionism of the time
1920s Bronislaw Malinowski calls for ethnographic study of law
1940s- Hoebel’s revival of evolutionary model influences the study of the
“legal.” Up to this point anthropologists studied the political along
with other aspects of social life. Beginning in the 1940s, anthropologists developed a vocabulary and discourse to address the “political.” Important figures here are E.E. Evans-Pritchard’s study of the Nuer people of southern Sudan; Max Gluckman’s ethnographic research in South Africa; Fredrik Barth’s study of the Swat and Edmund Leach’s research in what is now Sri Lanka.
1950s Anthropologists get criticized by political scientist David Easton for
finding politics everywhere (a view which by the way permeated the field today)
With the increased specialization in the discipline, the study of politics emerges as a separate domain within cultural anthropology. Question of how to do research after WWII; concerns about the tools
1950s- Gluckman and Bohannan debate the application of Anglo-American
1960s legal categories to non-Western societies. Rise of action theory,
symbolic theory and systems theory; influence of the Vietnam war
Late 1960s-1970s Movement away from rule-centered study of law to
processual approach
1980s Postmodern critique; anthropologists turn to the US; criticism and challenge to the ideas of the very much alive ideas of the Enlightenment.
1990s Interdisciplinary forces within legal anthropology; issues of power embedded in
knowledge claims
In honor of my Hispanic Anthropology Professor, who was fired because she came to my aid. I am a South Texan. I did not know she was Hispanic. I thought she was my Professor. I made a plea that I would drop all charges if they would just hire her back.............. Nobody was listening.
The things people say and why they same them. My ADA complaints were never about me!!!!
“Target Bait” how Texans can take the heat off of Senator Windy – Be Creative!
Turn the Nanny Cams on the Real Criminals
“Sociopathetic Barracudas”
http://solidstateindependence.blogspot.com/search/label/Crimes%20Against%20Humanity
Post a Comment