Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Texas U.S. Marshal False Claim Block Disabled Appearing In the Western District San Antonio Division

The Texas GOP Political Machine
Illegal Wiretapping Stalking Tracking Surveillance FAA (Target) 

We must commend the University of Texas Austin for finally publishing a good definition of Stalking Behaviors (excert below) which unfortunately match many Staff Stalking Behaviors (including police/FBI). Please view the following safety sheet published by UT Austin and makes a check list of those violations that you have experienced by Staff and Police on University of Texas Campuses at Any Location:

1. Following the person or repeatedly showing up unexpectedly at the person's class, work, favorite coffee shop, etc.
2. Sending unwanted gifts, letters, cards, or e-mails  
3.  Repeatedly calling, including "hang-ups"  
4. Monitoring victim's activity, such as phone calls, computer use, or schedule
5. Using technology to track the victim, such as hidden cameras, computer viruses, and GPS  Devices
6. Driving by places where the person spends time
7. Causing damage to victim's home, car, or other property
8. Making threats to the victim; the victim's family, friends, pets, or colleagues; or to own self
9. Searching out information about victim with the aid of public records, Internet search services, hired investigators, or contacting friends, family, classmates, or co-workers
10. Sifting through victim's trash or other items victim has had contact with
11. Engaging in actions meant to control, track, or frighten victim
12. Unwarranted search and seizures of your home or house and stalking by military helicopters order by Rick Perry Governor of Texas

The State of Texas vs The Honorable Rick Perry

Steward v. Perry - US Complaint in Intervention - September 20, 2012

Lubbock State School Findings Letter - December 11, 2006

I Am A Class Member That Cannot Participate

Without Legal Representation
Greg Abbott Should Be Arrested 
Senator Cornyn and Ted Cruz Should Be Ashamed of Themselves

5:10-cv-1025  (W.D. Tex.) 10/30/2012 
 PB-TX-0003-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]   

Complaint 12/20/2010 
PB-TX-0003-0001 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification 01/19/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0002 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Class Certification  01/19/2011 (W.D. Tex.) 
PB-TX-0003-0003 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Defendants' Opposed Motion to Abate Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 01/26/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0004 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Opposed Motion to Abate Motion for Class Certification  02/04/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0006 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Defendants' Motion to Dimiss Plaintiff's Complaint 03/08/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0007 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dimiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 04/18/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0008 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Statement of Interest of the United States of America 05/18/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0009 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Partial Consent Motion by the United States of America to Intervene and Memorandum in Support Thereof 06/22/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0012 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Defendants' Response in Opposition to the United States' Motion to Intervene 07/19/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0013 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

United States' Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene 08/04/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0014 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

First Amended Complaint 10/04/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0027 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Defendants' Partial Motion to Dimiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 11/04/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0015 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 11/23/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0016 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Supplemental Statement of Interest of the United States of America 11/30/2011 
PB-TX-0003-0017 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Class Certification 07/09/2012 
PB-TX-0003-0029 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Amended Motion for Class Certification 07/09/2012 
PB-TX-0003-0030 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum 07/23/2012 
PB-TX-0003-0023 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

United States' Complaint in Intervention  09/20/2012 
PB-TX-0003-0024 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]    

Order Granting Intervention 09/20/2012 (W.D. Tex.) 
PB-TX-0003-0028 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]  

Questions about Human Experiments
Direct Energy Weapons

The rule of law, also called supremacy of law, means that the law is above everyone and it applies to everyone. Whether governor or governed, rulers or ruled, no one is above the law, no one is exempted from the law, and no one can grant exemption to the application of the law. The Rule-of-law is why I sent a thank you note to Senator NY Sen. Schumer as follows:

A Thank You from Texas NY Sen. Schumer accuses OnStar of invading privacy

Dear Texas Congressional Representatives please pass on to the Senator Schumer that I have evidence that OnStar has been doing this for years in Texas as a tracking device by Private Security Firms and also open to other Hackers. I consider Private Security Firms before Obama's Executive order in April 2009 as illegal "Hackers".  They should have been prosecuted by a request by me to the Justice Department for Staking and Retaliation of a Disabled Student and I am still waiting. One of my specific concerns was OnStar and Illegal Hackers [Prior to EO in April 2009] My service was disconnected in 2009. When I purchased the plan the original contract expressed a powerful assurance that my privacy would not be violated.

Once I found out that I was being tracked, I discontinued the service under contractual conditions that all GPS devices were permanently terminated but as you see they were not. If it was just me, I would not report this to your office; however, it is a concern to at least one of your constituents and thousands of people across America that bought a vehicle with on-star between 2005-2010.

I and many others appreciate Senator Schumer efforts that enforce the Presidential executive order to NSA in 2008  “to preserve and enhance”  Civil rights and Civil Liberties.

NY Sen. Schumer accuses OnStar of invading privacy
Ap Associated Press By MICHAEL GORMLEY - Associated Press | AP – 4 hrs ago

A week ago, OnStar changed its policy and began continuing the connection for ex-customers unless they asked for it to be discontinued.
Finnor noted keeping the two-communication active for former customers could someday allow for emergency messages to be sent even to ex-customers about severe weather or evacuations. The open line could also allow OnStar to alert drivers about warranty information or recalls, she said.

Schumer said he isn't persuaded. He said customers shouldn't have to "opt out" of the tracking after they end service. He accuses OnStar of actively deceiving customers.
Schumer is announcing the effort Sunday by releasing a letter to the Federal Trade Commission seeking an investigation.

OnStar charges about $199 a year for basic service and $299 a year for service that includes navigation aid.

I gathered my research by interviewing Alsatian immigrants in Castroville, Texas who still had living memory of the area’s history and spending days in the Castroville library that had a collection of local, national, and international works not yet replaced by online computer terminals.  Unlike the nearest university library empty of books and people, this small town book depository was full of locals reading books and enjoying the library’s resources less history repeat!

My home, a farm house, was miles away from my field project so I spent the last night in an old Inn after interviewing Mary, a young lady my age for information concerning my research. Mary, a Park Ranger, suggested that I stay at the local historic Landmark Inn which was the be-ginning of a lifelong relationship.

Like I said previously, a miracle is a positive event in our lives that seems to oppose the laws of physics or the natural order of things. Perhaps miracles are natural events outside of peripheral perception or beyond the limits of human reasoning that gives hope in times of despair or uncertainty. Here is looking back at you!

 “History has taught us to be vigilant about the loss of liberty 
to those who want to monitor us in order to increase our security”

Thousands of Discarded Disability Claims U.S. Colleges and Universities Still In Limbo August 2011
 (Many of these people are still being stalked or have derogatory information held by Private Security Firms, unable to find gainful employment or harassed by law enforcement for information that they should not have.)
What happened inside the Office of Civil Rights during the Bush Administration that gridlock and denied valid civil rights claims that insure due process, justice, and anti-discrimination policies that should have been  applied on U.S. Colleges and Universities which had a direct causal effect on the 100 fold increase in  campus violence in  the years 2001-2008.  Several creditable reports show  the use of terms by senior and supervisory staff such as "commies" and "Socialist" to demoralize staff members enforcing the law under the Bush Ad-ministration.  The Office of Civil Rights is the  most important government agency in Washington ensuring equal protections of the law and prosecute violations and acts of hatred against those that can not protect themselves.  Thomas Perez has announced  the turn around in the OCR's  office of attorney and legal counsel as follows:

Statement  of  Thomas E. Perez Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice Before the Committee of the Judiciary United States Senate Concerning the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice Presented April 20, 2010

Thank you U.S. Justice Department for Stepping Up! Read the Bold Truthful Report from Thomas E. Perez Assistant Attorney General Office of  Civil Rights at the following link:

"My administration has a Civil Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination"

"Perhaps most importantly, this involves assembling a team of committed, talented career attorneys and professional staff to carry out the Division's critical work. Between 2003 and 2007, more than 70 percent of Division's attorneys left, many taking with them year o experience and expertise."

"The Division has made considerable pro-gress in the protection of rights for individuals with disabilities. The Disability Rights Section in the first year of the Administration filed 12 lawsuits and reached 39 settlement agreements. This work includes 14 new agreements under Project Civic Access, which allow the Division to  Work cooperatively with local government to ensure greater access to Civic programs and services of individuals with disabilities."

"Meanwhile, the Administration's first year proved to be a landmark for federal enforcement of the Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999), a ruling requiring state to eliminate unnecessary segregation of persons with disabilities and provide those individuals with services in the most integrated steering appropriate. The Omstead decision has often been called the Brown v. Board of Education of the  disability rights movement, and in the last year the Department filed amicus briefs in five separate cases in Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, Illinois, and Florida, and intervened in a case in New York (Perez)."

One of  first OCR articles in 2009 titled "United States Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez to speak at NCCU School of Law" states "The mission of the Civil Rights & Constitutional Law Society is to promulgate the continued need for activism, advocacy, discussion, research, writing, and legal representation for civil and human rights issues."

One state in the union, Texas has made it clear that they will not participate, condone, nor support disability mandates concerning disabled student equality, access to a higher education, or equal protection under  the law, arguing  only 'able bodies'  are protected by the constitution under the 10th amendment  and 'disabled bodies' are a burden of care by way of virtue of the State of Texas (Rick Perry). Perhaps we should bring back the sporting term of 'handicapped' and remove the disability by two thirds vote of congress!

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Re-Post Original April 2009: A Community Service or what the world looks like from my home, my extended families view and thousands of other South Texans. A matter of court records, police reports, FBI visits, contact with the Secret Service, and Office of Civil Rights grievances, who complained that I submitted too many, 22 at their request and with the threat of endangerment of lives?

Many were never worked because my final statement in May 2008 was hidden from the investigating officer(s), while I was stalked in Mexico attending college [An FBI Official School] and returned to San Antonio and got more of the same Data Record Manipulation, Stalking, and Retaliation, without any legal representation.

The system set-up by John Cornyn failed as I was sandwiched between a threat assessment training program, and at the same time I was also a subject of experimentation conducted by the state, on and off campus (unknowingly and without any compensation or permission from me). I was watching their reports about me the subject of observation, who became a suspect and finally an enemy of the state - Human Experimentation Outside of Protocol.

As you can see this has been a five year ordeal for me and my extended family. It must have cost the state and federal government millions of dollars just to attack my family and if you add the thousands of other families targeted in this same way; you might come up a Trillion Dollar deficit reduction.

My personal friend Harold Mandel wrote "Scores ruined by American psychiatric tyranny who could have done well elsewhere?" I certainly could of done better with the millions of dollars wasted on abusing the disabled by helping those in need. In fact, I still have not gotten a comptroller report with the detailed cost requested from Congressman Henry Cuellar office or a copy of a Vietnam consultant log-in form requested from him in April 2009. His office personnel has blocked communications three times from me and sent me to the wrong congressional representative to keep from working my concerns, which include a rejected valid VA disability claim that I have been treated by military doctors while and sense I was in the Military!

A true representation of what disabled students including disabled veterans in Texas go through much like a David and Goliath biblical story; however, most are crushed by The Giant of Political Bureaucracy. By the grace of God therefore I go...............

We Must Share We Must Find Ways To Do It

Filed June 13 2012 Dist Atty 81st Texas,

Case Numbers 12-04270, 12-04429

Charge 1. Stalking Retaliation, Including International Stalking of a student and disabled Veteran  (No Response from the State Department resubmitted to John Kerry Secretary of the State United States of America)

Charge 2. State Sponsored Terrorism

Charge 3. State Deployment of Bio-Lethal Weapons On Texas Citizens

Allegation 3a. Hit My Electronic Pulse Two-weeks another dies same spot

Charge 4. Border Drone Stalking Deep within the State of Texas On Texas Citizens

Charge 6. Federal Data Manipulation, Hacking

Charge 7. Texas U.S. Marshal Blocks Me By Making A *'False Claim I Made A Threat' from Standing In Front of A Federal Magistrate to make a plea to Stop The Abuse of the Disabled, Elderly, and Children

No Place But Rick Perry's Texas

*In Texas I am guilty without going to trial; although I did not threaten anyone

"But a heavy veil of secrecy hangs over the details of most federal forfeiture cases, the vast majority of which were made based on investigations that are not disclosed in public records or even reviewed in federal court." 

“Whoever intentionally obstruct the proceedings before depts., agencies, and committees, obstruct this criminal investigation and/or retaliate against me because I am a victim, you will be punished to the full extent of the applicable law in 1505 of Title 18 Obstruction of proceedings before depts., agencies & committees, 1510 Obstruction of Criminal investigations, 1513 of Title 18 Retaliating against a witness, victim or an informant, or 1514 Civil Action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness. Whoever intentionally alters, destroys, mutilates or conceals records, or documents with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding will be punished to the full extent of law as defined in 1519 of Title 18 Destruction, Alteration or Falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.”

Post a Comment