Search This Blog

Showing posts with label FBI Sharing Program. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI Sharing Program. Show all posts

Sunday, December 29, 2013

They Are Sharing More 'Than You Think'

See Any Aliens Lately?

Community News & Events
Resource Identification Initiative – Antibodies Online is giving away “nerd mugs” to help identify antibodies in your paper.
December 16th, 2013 10:14 AM
Dear NIF Community members; Our partners in crime, FORCE11, are hosting a working group, the Resource Identification Initiative, that ... read more »
Congratulations to Phil Bourne, the New NIH Director for Data 


http://www.neuinfo.org/

How Many People Unemployed And Are Human
Subjects of Experimentation Who Do Not Get
Paid for The Abuse?

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Texas Victims of Crimes No Response Tea Party Up To Baine & Co. Tricks Again

Published 10/04/2013





All illegal activities concerning Cyber-attacks were given to the FBI IVERP in detail and should now be in the Texas Victims of Crime Section and I should have got a call by now from the Texas Victims of Crimes. Also duly reported to the Sheriff’s Department and Local Police Somerset Texas


There IS No Justice In Texas 
Five Years of Torment, Financial Decimation, Experiments, Torture, and Military Attacks
 http://www.linearism.org/contactus.html

Five Years  NDAA Detention Financial Decimation Experiments Torture and Military Attacks 

US-CERT - Incident Reporting System

Summary of report: 2012-USCERTv32ZCEN2
Gregory O'Dell
No, this is not an ISAC report 

https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/index.php?SID=0de5297e57f5e41d952c7fcc8926a93c
Page 1 of 5
First Name Last Name Email Address Telephone number Are you reporting as part of an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC)? What type of Private Sector  organization is reporting this incident? What is the High  impact to the reporting organization? What type of Contact  followup action are you requesting at this time? Describe the Future Threat  current status or resolution of this incident. From what time (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)  zone are you making this report? What is the August 23,2012 14:25 approx time the incident started? (local time) When was this August 23,2012 14:25 incident detected? (local time) Please provide a Are you aware of thess cases? Texas Criminal Cases State Sponsored Terrorism Criminal Case short No. 12-04720, 12-0442929 Atascosa County Texas Sheriff's Dep. Faxed To The FBI San Antonio description of Office By An Officer of The Law. Filed June 13 2012 Dist Atty 81thTexas, Still [8.23,2012] No the incident and Response as of date Charge 1. Stalking Retaliation, includes international stalking Charge 2. impact State Sponsored Terroristic Threats Charge 3. State Deployment of Bio-Lethal or Non-Lethal Weapons On Texas Citizens Charge 4. Border Drone Stalking Deep within the State of Texas On Texas Citizens Thank You Gregory N. O'Dell 1290 Mc Coy Raod Somerset Texas 78069 830-429-1965 How many [Left Blank] systems are impacted by this incident?
8/23/2012


US-CERT - Incident Reporting System

(Leave blank if Unknown) How many sites [Left Blank] are impacted by this incident? (Leave blank if Unknown) Was the data Unknown  involved in this incident encrypted? Was critical Unknown  infrastructure impacted by this incident? What was the Other  primary method used to identify the incident? If available, [Left Blank] please include 5-10 lines of time-stamped logs in plain ASCII text. (e.g.,CSV). First Name Gregory Last Name O'Dell Email Address odellgregory@yahoo.com Telephone 8304291965 number What type of Federal Government  organization is impacted by this incident? If known, what is OIG 20120626-01 the impacted organization's incident tracking number for this issue? If known, What High  is the impact to the impacted organization? What U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs  Federal Agency is being impacted by this incident? Please select a Veterans Benefits Administration  sub-agency of the Department of Veterans Affairs. If known, please [Left Blank] enter the relevant protocol (HTTP, SMTP, etc.) used in the attack.

https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/index.php?SID=0de5297e57f5e41d952c7fcc8926a93c
Page 2 of 5
8/23/2012


US-CERT - Incident Reporting System

If known, what is [ ] Proxy Server the primary purpose(s) of the victim host system? [Check all that apply]  [ ] Router  [ ] Server  [ ] Switch  [ ] Time server  [ ] Unknown  [ ] Web server  [*] Workstation  [ ] Printer  [ ] Blackberry/PDA/Mobile Agent  [ ] Other  [ ] Application Server  [ ] Database Server  [ ] Domain controller  [ ] Domain Name Server (DNS)  [ ] File Server  [ ] Firewall  [ ] Laptop  [ ] Mail server What Anti-virus Unknown  software is installed on the victim system? Provide any Dell Inspiron Windows 7 Xp Hughes Satelite Connection additional description of victim system that may be helpful. If known, please 192.168.0.1 enter the victim's IP address in dotted decimal format (e.g., 192.168.10.1). If known, please 2  select the subnet mask (CIDR notation as a numeric value from 1 to 32) of the victim system. If known, please 192.168.0.254 identify any ports involved in the attack from

https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/index.php?SID=0de5297e57f5e41d952c7fcc8926a93c
Page 3 of 5
8/23/2012


US-CERT - Incident Reporting System


https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/index.php?SID=0de5297e57f5e41d952c7fcc8926a93c
Page 4 of 5
the victims point of view. Example: 23,25,60-90,1024-Please enter any Print this page. Identification ST Name HNSDSS6555531 Site Id 840636 ESN 111000125740048 additional notes ODU Serial Number 300919404974 ODU Part Number 1500913-0003 Software Boot Software about the victim Version 081522aa Commissioning Software Version 081522ca Operational Software Version system that may 084019aa Minimum Commissioning Software Version Required 1043 Satellite Uplink Cell 9 be helpful. Downlink Microcell 100 Uplink Polarization LHCP Downlink Polarization LHCP Shaped Beam Types Full & West Conus Shaped Beam Polarization LHCP Uplink Mode Bandwidth On Demand Transmit Radio Wattage 1.000000 Antenna Size 0.740000m Port 1 Addressing LAN Port IPv4 Address 192.168.0.1 LAN Port IPv4 Subnet Mask 255.255.255.0 Last Usable IPv4 Address 192.168.0.254 LAN Port IPv6 Address Unassigned LAN Port IPv6 Prefix Unassigned Port 2 Addressing LAN Port IPv4 Address Unassigned LAN Port IPv4 Subnet Mask Unassigned Last Usable IPv4 Address Unassigned LAN Port IPv6 Address Unassigned LAN Port IPv6 Prefix Unassigned Addresing IPv4 Default Gateway Satellite IPv4 Local Address Domain ID 2 Address Translation Within Local Domain 174.32.221.52 Static Address Mapping Within Local Domain Not Configured Address Translation to External Domains Not Configured Static Address Mappings to External Domains Not Configured Dynamic Address Translation to External Domains Enabled IPv6 Default Gateway Not Assigned IPv6 Local Address Domain ID 2 Software Feature ISRP Mode Disabled ISRP Redirect Behavior Do Not Generate ; Accept ; Drop Data IGMP Send Mode Disabled H.323 Proxy Disabled Dialer Proxy Disabled TCP Acceleration Enabled HTTP GET Compression Enabled DNS Caching Answer Cache Enabled ; Preload Cache Disabled Turbo Page Enabled Active Turbo Page Servers 67.142.163.20 SSL Acceleration Disabled IPsec Disabled DHCP Configuration Server 192.168.0.2 - 192.168.0.254 ; 0.0.0.0 - 0.0.0.0 Port 1 Software Feature DHCP Mode Server DHCPv6 Mode Disabled IGMP Receive Disabled IRDP Preference Disabled RIP Mode Disabled RIPng Mode Disabled ND Router Advertisement Mode Disabled DSCP Mode Disabled VRRP Disabled PBR Disabled Port 2 Software Feature DHCP Mode Server DHCPv6 Mode Disabled IGMP Receive Disabled IRDP Preference Disabled RIP Mode Disabled RIPng Mode Disabled ND Router Advertisement Mode Disabled DSCP Mode Disabled VRRP Disabled PBR Disabled MAC Addresses User Port 1 0:80:ae:75:6d:65 User Port 2 0:80:ae:75:6d:65 What is the Windows XP  operating system of the victim computer? If known, what is [ ] Proxy Server the primary purpose(s) of the attacker host system? [Check all that apply]  [ ] Router  [ ] Server  [ ] Switch  [ ] Time server  [*] Unknown  [ ] Web server  [ ] Workstation  [ ] Printer  [ ] Blackberry/PDA/Mobile Agent  [ ] Other  [ ] Application Server  [ ] Database Server  [ ] Domain controller  [ ] Domain Name Server (DNS)
8/23/2012


US-CERT - Incident Reporting System



[ ] File Server [ ] Firewall [ ] Laptop [ ] Mail server
US-CERT Security Policy | Version: 2.5 | Page: 7 | Report ID: 2012-USCERTv32ZCEN2 | Date: 201208231038 Please click here to provide comments and feedback on the Incident Reporting Form

https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/index.php?SID=0de5297e57f5e41d952c7fcc8926a93c
Page 5 of 5
        What Anti-virus Unknown  software is installed on the attacker system? Provide any Austin Fusion Center additional description of attacker system that may be helpful. If known, please [Left Blank] enter the attacker's IP address in dotted decimal format (e.g., 192.168.10.1 ). If known, please   select the subnet mask (CIDR notation as a numeric value from 1 to 32) of the attacker system. If known, please [Left Blank] identify any ports involved in the attack from the attackers point of view. Example: 23,25,60-90,1024-Please enter any See FBI Report Are you aware of thess cases? Texas Criminal Cases State Sponsored additional notes Terrorism Criminal Case No. 12-04720, 12-0442929 Atascosa County Texas Sheriff's Dep. about the Faxed To The FBI San Antonio Office By An Officer of The Law. Filed June 13 2012 Dist Atty attacker system 81thTexas, Still [8.23,2012] No Response as of date Charge 1. Stalking Retaliation, includes that may be international stalking Charge 2. State Sponsored Terroristic Threats Charge 3. State Deployment helpful. of Bio-Lethal or Non-Lethal Weapons On Texas Citizens Charge 4. Border Drone Stalking Deep within the State of Texas On Texas Citizens Thank You Gregory N. O'Dell 1290 Mc Coy Raod Somerset Texas 78069 830-429-1965 What is the Unknown  operating system of the attacking computer? ---------- End of report ----------
8/23/2012

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Texas Lt. Gov. Dewhurst Still Using CIA Authority He Does Not Have

A Job For The Clandestine Monks

When a White Flag Does Not Get The Proper Attention
Texas Lt. Gov. Dewhurst Still Using CIA Authority He Does Not Have

Anybody Claiming to be the Secret Service or CIA Agent and is not, throws that authority around to harm others is a treasonous act!

All veterans are bond to respond to the Secret Service  - They Are Supreme!


Texas Lt. Gov. Dewhurst Still Using CIA Authority He Does Not Have

Prosecutes Veterans That Wear a Medal Not Deserving, which is Ok by me but this guy, has gone too far, when he claims association with the CIA such a highly regarded position of Public Trust – He Can No Longer Be Trusted!

These People like Dewhurst Got Two CIA agents Shot in Mexico

The Same People Who Raided Farms in South Central Texas 2000-2008


http://www.texasobserver.org/david-dewhurst-calls-obamas-impeachment/

Before April 21, 2005, the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) headed both the Intelligence Community and the Central Intelligence Agency. In addition, DCI served as an advisor to the President of the United States on intelligence matters and was the statutory intelligence advisor to the National Security Council (NSC). On April 21, 2005, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) took on the roles as head of the Intelligence Community and principal intelligence advisor to the President and the NSC.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_the_Central_Intelligence_Agency

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Our Gang Whitey Bulger and the Little Rascals NSA Privacy Why Should It Concern YOU!

NSA 
"What a bunch of crap is coming through"
See Texas Fusion Center Report Below
Texas Rick Perry - Real People, Real Murders, Real Abuse or Why it Should Concern You!
********************************

The FBI Our Gang

NSA Privacy Why Should It Concern YOU!

Privacy Why It Should Concern You!
You Could Be A Texas Governor Rick Perry Target
Don't Be A Stooge!


3–5–56: A personal and confidential memorandum from the Special
Agent in Charge (SAC) in Boston to FBI Director J. Edgar
Hoover states the following information about James ‘‘Whitey’’
Bulger: ‘‘This office had known Bulger because of his suspected im-
VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:39 Feb 04, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00462 Fmt 6604 Sfmt 6604 D:\REPORTS\90615.TXT HGOVREF1 PsN: HGOVREF1
453
plication in TFIS tailgate thefts. We knew of his extremely dangerous
character, his remarkable agility, his reckless daring in
driving vehicles, and his unstable, vicious characteristics.’’ Agents
Paul Rico and Herbert F. Briick, ‘‘undertook to develop a PCI [Possible
Confidential Informant] who could and would inform on
Bulger’s location. . . . 

The Whitey Papers 







SA’s Briick and Rico continued to contact REDACTED
the public eye. Certainly we cannot relax even momentarily our efforts
in combating the criminal underworld including the prosecution
of Top Hoodlums. The foundation from which we forge our attack
must be kept strong and fresh with a full flow of information
from well placed informants. . . . All Agents in conducting investigation
of criminal matters should be constantly alert for the development
of new informants and new potential informants who
may be in a position to assist us.’’ 18
4–27–61: The Attorney General held a meeting in his office regarding
the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section. Those in
attendance were: Deputy Attorney General White, Assistant Attorney
General Miller, Walter Sheridan, a special consultant to the
Attorney General with reference to organized crime matters; Edward
Silberling, Head of the Organized Crime and Racketeering
Section, and his assistant, Henry Petersen. ‘‘The Attorney General
stated in very emphatic terms his dissatisfaction with the lack of
progress by the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section. . . .
The Deputy Attorney General pointed up the need for the receipt
of full information in order to develop a case and cautioned against
too speedy action. The Attorney General took issue with this, saying
that while it was necessary to develop information, nevertheless,
he expected the attorneys in the Organized Crime Section to
be more aggressive and get something accomplished. . . . The Attorney
General concluded the meeting by reiterating that he was
going to insist on action being taken by the Organized Crime and
Racketeering Section and he expected something to be accomplished.
He advised he intended to hold another meeting on May
20 and by that time, those in the section would have to be in a position
to report more favorably or he might have to take other action
to get the job done.’’ (This information is contained in an FBI
Memorandum from C.A. Evans to Mr. Parsons dated April 28,
1961).19

6–21–61: The Top Echelon Criminal Informant Program was inaugurated.