Texas Governor Rick Perry Weapons Testing On His Own People Oh no There Goes San Antonio Go Go Godzilla

Oh no There Goes San Antonio Go Go Away
Godzilla RICO Perry

EMF Weapons Testing Texas Governor Rick Perry

Final Judgment : U.S. v. Raytheon Company and Texas Instruments, Inc. http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f5100/5121.htm

Kens5 News TV Reports Ionization Radiation 

"In San Antonio is Equal to An x-ray" 

Direct from the Source Here

How About Living Memory
JFK Assassination  

Why Report The News If You Are Not Using Source Documents

****************************
The Following Is Not Ancient History

Radiation Weapons Testing Report To FBI

Carry's a 25 year Prison Sentence For Each Count

Still Act Like They Don't Know ? How Can They Protect Us If They Don't?

Why is there a law against It if 
IT does not exist?

San Antonio Texas

Senator Ted Cruz Feel The Itching And Burning of your Constituents

Don't Blame NSA They Get Orders From John Cornyn and U.S. Senate
And In This Case The Texas Executive Frankenstein

 

Why It Brought Tears To Eyes 
And Burning Sensation

These People Don't Know What You and I Know

BioEffects EMF Outdated http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf 

Cyber Attacks? Electronic Warfare does not rest in the Domain of a Universe that does not exist
Human Exploitation Other ________________________

The Attorney Generals of every State Except Greg Abbott’s Texas have a way for citizens to report such events of physical attacks by way of the victims of crime web sites set-up in almost every state of the union.
The misconception caused by those who like to build words and phrases that are not in the dictionary such as "Cyber-Space" has placed a heavy ambiguous burden of the threat of electronic warfare and National Security. Electronic warfare does not rest in a universe that does not exist such as "Cyber-Space."
Trillions of dollars have been allocated to a domain of non-existence that has the power to deliver or discharge an electronic attack such as by microwave or involving anything within the domain of the electromagnetic spectrum such as sticking your finger in a light socket, which delivers electrocution to a person from our electrical grids.

 Electrocution, rest in the domain of the physical universe not Cyber-Space - which is a universe that does not exist. I cannot help anyone that does not have a belief in God. A belief in God is a win win proposition. Just look at the power and trillions of dollars allotted to something that does exist has such as "Cyber-Space."

The DOD should reconsider the internet just a point of delivery just like our electrical grid, so we can control or defend attacks on United States citizens living inside the borders of the United States. When words or phrases are fabricated such as "Cyber Space" disrupts our legislative branch, who now cannot write legislation to protect citizens or can citizens access a way to report an incident of electronic attack. Citizens such as me that have been attacked have reported to local police and have been hospitalized from the events; however, local law enforcement is not trained to respond to such events.

Many cases such as mine are ignored by local law enforcement as delusions, so the events cannot be recorded as valid and sound or collected for purposes for our protection. How do you report physical attacks by electronic warfare delivered by an electronic device; be it a telephone, cell phone, personal computer or satellite device? As of today you cannot do so!

The Attorney Generals of every State should have a way for citizens to report such events of physical attacks by way of the victims of crime web sites set-up in almost every state of the union.  Please consider a way to report an electronic event so we can see the problem and the DOD can address the problem rationally.
I know of one case where the proper procedure was followed in the State Texas; however, the state failed to respond:
**************************************
Pentagon declares the Internet a war domain
By John T. Bennett - 07/14/11 07:58 PM ET

The Pentagon released a long-promised cybersecurity plan Thursday that declares the Internet a domain of war but does not spell out how the U.S. military would use the Web for offensive strikes.
The Defense Department’s first-ever plan for cyberspace states that DOD will expand its ability to thwart attacks from other nations and groups, beef up its cybersecurity workforce and expand collaboration with the private sector.
Citation: http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/171531-pentagon-declares-the-internet-a-domain-of-war
******************************************
Specialist in Technology and National Security, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division makes certain distinctions that make it difficult to address by alluding to something that does not exist or is an invisible crime. Electronic warfare is not an invisible crime, it can and does cause physical harm!

The CRS Report from Congress, Order Code RL31787, Information Operations, Electronic Warfare, and Cyberwar: Capabilities and Related Policy Issues, Updated March 20, 2007 by Clay Wilson
Electronic Warfare as of 2007 is considered Information Operations (IO). As of that date, IO activities   are grouped by the Department of defense (DOD) into five core capabilities: (1) Psychological  Operations, (2)Military Deception,(3) Operational security, (4) Computer Network Operations, and (5)  Electronic warfare.
Citation: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL31787.pdf
**************************************************
The DOD should reconsider the internet just a point of delivery just like our electrical grid, so we can control or defend attacks on United States citizens living inside the borders of the United States. When words or phrases are fabricated such as "Cyber Space" disrupts our legislative branch, who now cannot write legislation to protect citizens or can citizens access a way to report an incident of electronic attack. Citizens such as me that have been attacked have reported to local police and have been hospitalized from the events; however, local law enforcement is not trained to respond to such events.
Many cases such as mine are ignored by local law enforcement as delusions, so the events cannot be recorded as valid and sound or collected for purposes for our protection. How do you report physical attacks by electronic warfare delivered by an electronic device; be it a telephone, cell phone, personal computer or satellite device? As of today you cannot do so!
The Attorney Generals of every State should have a way for citizens to report such events of physical attacks by way of the victims of crime web sites set-up in almost every state of the union.  Please consider a way to report an electronic event so we can see the problem and the DOD can address the problem rationally.
*******************************************************
“DOD has noted that military functions involving the electromagnetic spectrum take place in what is now called the cyber domain, similar to air , land, and sea. This cyber domain is the responsibility of the new Air Force Cyber Command and includes cyber warfare, electronic warfare, and protection of U.S. critical infrastructure networks that support telecommunications systems, utilities, and Transportation.”
Citation: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL31787.pdf
***************************************************
Congress should take immediate action to find ways and means for citizens to report an electronic attack. One suggestion would be to put out an FBI alert to all Law enforcement personal to take electronic attacks reports seriously and encourage citizens to report such events without retaliation or even considering the victim as delusional, such was the case of rape cases not long ago; as if the victim was delusional and the criminals avoided prosecution simply because Local Law enforcement officials were not trained properly!

by G N O'Dell

BioEffects EMf Outdated http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet56/oet56e4.pdf 
  
Acronym Dictionary -  http://www.microwaves101.com/content/acronyms.cfm 

Microwave Hall of Fame - Microwave Encyclopedia - http://Microwaves101.com http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/halloffame1.cfm#marconi

MMICs - Microwave Encyclopedia - http://Microwaves101.com http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/mmics.cfm

Final Judgment : U.S. v. Raytheon Company and Texas Instruments, Inc. http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f5100/5121.htm

The Things People Say and Why They Say It

Just The Way You Want It
Why I Say The Things I Do
"What-A-Burger™"

Driving back from the local FedEx office after doing what the honorable Senator Cornyn instructed me to do, “Work with the FBI and ITVERP” concerning three terrorist bombings that I survived, a church sign grabbed my attention because the way the preacher had said it,

 “Who Is God To You?”

That was an easy one for me, “God is everything, I am nothing.” I assumed if the preacher were listening to my response, he would rephrase my Hindu syntax with something like this, “Paul said, we must die daily.” 

What the preacher might have said or "The Things People Say and Why They Say It"  was an assumption. It is a mater of fact, the preacher was a man that climbed a ladder to place black letters into the church sign is a logical conclusion.

What we say, how we say it, and why we say the things we do, is a logical linguistic link to how things come to be. 

My favorite English teacher Mrs. Rowland would always remind me of the distinction between the way we speak and the way we write by holding up a book and telling me, “This is just a book it cannot say anything.” 

Well, Mrs. Rowland, the preacher who posted the question today, “Who Is God to You?” and I have a different opinion.  I am sure, the good reverend has held up the good book, while preaching to a whole congregation of people, “The Bible Says!”

I might hold up a note you wrote back in 1964 my parents found wedge in our front door and say, “I know Mrs. Rowland to be a believer because she said; Thank God!” after finding a classmate and me in her school playground, eight hours after a nuclear explosion November 13, 1963.

Miss Rowland’s note is a logical linguistic link to my living memory of her kind patience with me. She wrote the note six months after, apologizing to my parents for leaving me unattended at the school, saying she was “Responsible for watching out for Gregory.” 

If I turn Mrs. Rowland’s note over, you can clearly see “she was still watching out for me” while softening what she normally would have said, I “anticipate that the end is near.” 

The things people carry after a nuclear event or “The Things People Say and Why They Say It”  


Even Today, I know what Mrs. Rowland would say to me, "Don't Go There"

- G. O'Dell 05/02/2013

Below is a Chinese Based web site. Where the line is for freedom of expression and attacks against the integrity of the United States I have drawn my own line here based on Personal experience - 

My recommendation Don't Cross Following Line.

'Soleilmavis Lee' AKA Tokyo Rose PRA Propaganda
http://mindcon.wordpress.com/tag/armes-psychotroniques/

LinkedIn

MESSAGES

It would be much appreciated that if you could give a little donation to help for publishing my book.

LinkedIn

MESSAGES

It would be much appreciated that if you could give a little donation to help for publishing my book.

 -Soleilmavis 

Raise money for publishing book

$100 raised by 5 people in 13 months. 

Reply to Soleilmavis L. | Reply To All 

Don't want to receive e-mail notifications? Adjust your message settings. 

Don't want to receive e-mail notifications? Adjust your message settings.