Update Just In: Texas Governor Rick Perry's Note To The President Found On Austin's Airport Flight Line
We Found A Niche In Investigative Journalism
We all were sent a "Walking to New Orleans"
And we still don't have a penny in our pockets. The money is all offshore and not even in American Banks?
 |
Texas Governor Rick Perry's Note Found on
Flight Line |
Dear Talkshow Hostess Burley and Advocates
of Honest Judiciaries,
I would
like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to address your audience. I gladly
accept your invitation to appear on your show next week.
You are willing to be one of those who set in motion
the investigative bandwagon rather than one of those who will run after it to
get on board. Merit and recognition will be earned by the former: They will be
known as Champions of Justice.
Indeed,
next time we can discuss how you and your audience can contribute to exposing
judges’ wrongdoing in light of Offshore Leaks’ revelations of financial
wrongdoing by resorting to social media:
Just as
the people in Tunisia and Egypt using Twitter and Facebook brought down decades
old dictators and gave rise to the Arab Spring, you and your audience can set in
motion an ‘investigative bandwagon’ that can rattle the Federal Judiciary to its
foundation and expose its judges’ wrongdoing as their institutionalized modus
operandi.
In that
vein, I would like to suggest that you become the “producer” of a show that can
have far-reaching resonance in practice:
1. the Investigative Journalists send
a) to your show
–broadcast simultaneously on the other shows linked to it– or to the shows that
sequentially will follow it as a reinforcing series of shows
b) a representative, such as
2. to discuss with you and me my proposal
that the Investigative Journalists
a) describe the Offshore
Leaks, that is, the financial files that were leaked to them and that thanks to
their 15-month high tech investigation revealed how well-connected, wealthy
private persons and public officers, who are likely to include judges, use
offshore tax havens to conceal assets through layers of secrecy fabricated with
false names, addresses, strawmen, trusts-upon-trusts, mailbox corporations,
etc., so as to avoid taxes and launder their money of its criminal origin; and
b) apply the thus
gained unparalleled Follow the money! experience in discovering concealed
financial accounts and their true owners to exposing the off-and onshore
accounts belonging to particularly harmful kind of public officers:
life-appointed federal judges, who in practice
are above investigation, whether official, http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf
>jur:21§1, or
journalistic, id. >jur:81§1, and abuse
their power in self-interest to commit and cover up their wrongdoing, which
erodes their ever-diminishing respect for the rule of law even as they make
decisions that affect We the People’s rights, property, liberty, and
life; and to that end,
c) begin with the search for the
assets that The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico, id.
>jur:65fn107a-c, suspected
Then-Judge, Now-U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Sotomayor, xxxv, of having concealed.
Your show or the series of shows produced by you
thanks to your access to fellow talkshow hosts and other media members can set
in motion an event that has never before occurred: a Watergate-like, 100§3, generalized media investigation of the Federal
Judiciary’s Judges Above the Law, 65§§1-4.
The Watergate Scandal began on June 17, 1972,
with what was derided as “a garden variety
burglary” by five men scorned as
“plumbers” who broke into the headquarters of the
Democratic National Committee at the Watergate building complex in Washington,
D.C.
Despite all the derision, Washington Post
Reporters Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward pursued their leads with the intuition
of superior journalists who sense that ‘something doesn’t smell good’.
Progressively, the stench of political espionage, abuse of power, and conspiracy
in furtherance of a cover-up mounted until it was unbearable for the rest of the
media to stay on the sidelines.
Ever more journalists bolted onto the
investigative bandwagon. They gave rise to one of the investigative journalism
stories pursued by the largest number of media outlets for the longest time with
the highest stakes: the Watergate Scandal.
Month after month for over two years, Woodward
and Bernstein were the key figures of the national media. They were instrumental
in leading to an unthinkable, unprecedented result: the resignation of the
President of the United States, Richard Nixon, on August 8, 1974, and the
imprisonment of all his White House aides.
Until this day, Woodward and Bernstein are icons
of investigative journalism.
Do you
have any idea what it would mean for you personally and professionally if:
1.
thanks to your commitment to justice, negotiation and entrepreneurial skills,
and the inspirational enthusiasm that you
exuded,
2. you produced a
simultaneously linked, 97§1, or
series of shows, 98§2, that
together with the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists
3. set in motion a
Watergate-like investigative bandwagon, 81§1, which not even federal judges could derail, for
they cannot retaliate against all talkshows and all other media outlets at the
same time, lest they betray their self-protective, vindictive, wrongful motive
and incriminate themselves,
4. outraged,
83§§2-3, the
public with its revelations of widespread, routine wrongdoing committed or
tolerated by federal judges, which
5. rendered
politically unavoidable a congressional investigation with nationally televised
public hearings guided by the query “what did the justices and
judges know about financial and non-financial wrongdoing by federal judges and
their Federal Judiciary staff and when did they know it?”; and
6. caused the
execution by the FBI of subpoenas and search warrants and the exercise by the
Department of Justice of its contempt and penal powers on federal judges –whose
fellow judges, who are their friends, colleagues, and accomplices,
90§§b-d,
would protect unabashedly in the self-serving interest of preventing the
investigation from reaching them too- and
7. as a
profound and long institutional and constitutional crisis unfolded, covered
intensively by the media, and
8. a bankruptcy fraud
scheme run, 42fn60, by
federal judges and other insiders of the legal and bankruptcy system,
81fn169,
were exposed,
9. the exacerbated
outrage of the public, 83§§2-3,
grew to the point of forcing one or more federal judges, perhaps including J.
Sotomayor, out of office through resignation, as happened to Supreme Court
Justice Abe Fortas on May 14, 1969, after revelations by Life magazine,
93¶¶211-212,
or removal by impeachment, after which
10.
politicians, afraid of outraged voters at the polls, undertook judicial reform
that overhauled the Federal Judiciary by including, among other
things,
a. the
establishment of an independent inspector on the
Federal Judiciary,
b. the adoption of
judicial transparency, accountability, and Equal Justice, 44fn69, requirements legislation, 158§7, including the repeal of the Judicial Conduct and
Disability Act of 1980, 24§b;
and
c. the
creation of citizen boards of judicial accountability and
discipline?
Can you
imagine what these developments can mean for you personally and professionally?
You can
become a nationally recognized Champion of
Justice.
You may
share this email widely.
I look
forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
New York City
****************************************************
On
Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Ron Branson
<victoryusa@jail4judges.org>
wrote:
Dr. Cordero's Critique of JAIL4Judges
Critiqued By Dr. Les
Sachs
-------- Original Message --------
Dear Dr
Cordero,
Firstly, I
appreciate the seriousness and sincerity of your labour and efforts regarding
the judicial corruption nightmare of the USA, the most 'taboo' topic in the
Western world, which makes journalists tremble in fear, at ICIJ as elsewhere.
But I must really say that what you imagine as an effective action proposal, is
really the same sad, always-disappointed hope, of journalistic and media
coverage that has so confounded and disappointed the endless hundreds of
thousands of victims of the US crooked courts ... journalists ignoring the
mountains of 'smoking gun evidence' which the public would be fascinated to know
if presented by major media.
You have a
really hopeless dream here (as all of us have had at some point), that if just
this or that group of journalists will grab onto the cases, a great media storm
will suddenly catch fire.
But these
hopes and prayers for grand coverage by media and journalists, have always ended
in frustration and failure, because of who owns major media, and how journalists
are pressured and threatened.
I explained
this years ago in my FAQ on US Judicial and Legal Corruption (which in recent
years is blocked from most internet search results by the US-gov't-tied Googl.
Inc. search engine).
Consider the
following:
(1) The
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists has been approached many
times regarding US judicial corruption issues. They know the score there. If
they act aggressively on this issue with some 'reporting', they and their
organization will be put on trial by corrupt American judges, slandered in major
media, bankrupted and have assets seized if accessible in the US, or blocked
from major media coverage and Googl. search if outside the USA.
Just like my
own websites of journalism on US legal corruption, are generally now all blocked
by Googl. Inc. in Goog's efforts to get favours from bribed US judges.
I am
continually slandered on the internet, and all my websites are blocked from
Googl search so I cannot reply to lies, and victims of the US legal system often
cannot find my writings anymore. Once upon a time I too was a well-known 'media
person', invited to be on TV with Dan Rather, books published by America's top
publishing companies. ICIJ sees what happened to me ... and they fear this could
happen to them. I barely escaped from America alive, as you know. Possibly the
upcoming court proceedings here in Europe against Googl. Inc. for blocking my
websites, will get some media coverage inside the US to light a fire ... but it
is more likely that US media will do a lockdown and refuse to cover the story as
Googl. Inc. gets convicted here in Europe.
And you know
how Jail4Judges itself has been greatly harmed by internet sabotage and attacks,
in the efforts to prevent its message from reaching people.
(2)
Activists, journalists, innocent people have been killed, with me unable to help
them and the victims often unable to find and read what might have saved them,
because of the Goog Inc. media management and censoring of the web on judicial
corruption issues.
US reporters
are at times killed and 'suicided'. ICIJ members know that can be their fate as
well with judicial corruption reportage. A 'two gunshots to the head' suicide
(!) - as with Gary Webb. Or like the arrest and jailing of the wife of
Congressman John Conyers, Head of the US House Judiciary Committee, who was
fooled and tricked by Obama like so many Americans ... Conyers, with false
'hope' in Obama for 'change', was planning to conduct major congressional
hearings on bribed American judges, with all the info in his files ... So they
arrested Conyers' wife, and told Conyers he would be dead if he says anything,
just like they murdered Judiciary Committee Congressman Sonny Bono in the 1990s
... and just like they murdered US Federal Judge John Roll in 2011 shortly after
he dared to issue a ruling against Obama.
Federal
judge shot dead, drugged-up alleged 'lone gunman' quickly supposedly
'confessing', barely covered by US media ... but a good warning to all other US
judges. Play ball, or else get shot dead too.
(3) You
prominently use the example of Watergate, and Bob Woodward ... ha ha ha! You
apparently do not know the real story. US federal judges and even Presidents,
are only removed by the US elite, not by journalists ... Bob Woodward was not a
'brave reporter', he was a government agent working for higher powers than
Richard Nixon.
Watergate
was a coup d'état. Here is some material from the web posted by a friend here in
Brussels whom I know: "Watergate is another fake 'story' whose true facts
Americans don't know. Watergate was another US coup, less bloody than the JFK
killing in 1963. The supposed 'hero', Washington Post's Bob Woodward - still
selling lies and propaganda today - is a fraud and fake as 'brave reporter',
working for the military and CIA. In the late 1960s Bob Woodward was in the US
Navy working for Naval Intelligence under Admiral Thomas Moorer. In 1970 Admiral
Moorer became head of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff - head of the whole US
military - and Woodward left the US Navy to become a planted Washington Post
'reporter'. - Also in 1970, Admiral Moorer started running a spy ring against
the Nixon White House, with the US military thinking Nixon and Kissinger were
getting 'soft on Communists' etc.
Navy Yeoman
Charles Redford stole many White House documents and so on for the joint chiefs,
US Admiral Elmo Zumwalt getting some of the documents. The spy ring - US
military against the White House - was discovered at the end of 1971. But just
like with the military 'business plot' planned coup in the 1930s against US
President Franklin Roosevelt, exposed by US Marine General Smedley Butler ('War
is a Racket'), and Roosevelt's agreement not to prosecute the American elite
(including grand-pappy Bush) ...
Nixon agreed
to cover-up the military spy ring. Likely fearing to end up dead like JFK, Nixon
always feared to publicly denounce it for the rest of his life, tho did not deny
it. Despite Nixon's agreement to shut up and not prosecute, the military
remained unhappy, along with the American elite, who wanted Nixon out ...
Nixon, for
all his flaws, had come to the same conclusions as Jack Kennedy ... in other
words, make some peace with the commies, and try to build a better life for
Americans ... So Watergate was magnified into a scandal for a coup, the
Washington Post fake brave 'reporters' Woodward and Bernstein - with Woodward
still loyal to his old boss Admiral Moorer ... they took Nixon down. And ever
since, Bob Woodward's fake Washington Post ... version of the Watergate 'story'
has dominated. ... and the truth still basically squashed today, by the dominant
media framework ...
Nearly
everybody believes Watergate was some kind of pro-populist 'exposé'. A lot of
the Watergate facts has come out from investigators Len Colodny and Robert
Gettlin, a book 'Silent Coup' ... "
* * *
Dr Cordero,
I am sorry that your media plan for hoping to light a fire under 'investigative
journalists', is really just the same old hope that has been dashed and broken
against the wall of harsh reality for many years.
With best
wishes to you as a fellow labourer in the vineyard,
Les -- Dr
Les (Leslie - Leszek) Sachs
- Political
refugee from US in Europe - Writer on US legal and media corruption - target of
US threats of assassination, and of hate crimes of defamation.
My
journalism sites are blocked on the US-based internet search engines, especially
by criminal Googl. Inc - while hoaxes and lies are planted about me on the web
and on Wikimedia, by writers taking bribes, and by companies seeking to profit
from silencing or murdering me.
You can see
online a live photo of 'Google Internet Censorship - Censure d'Internet' showing
continuous ongoing suppression of my journalism sites. My work includes,
'Americans Murdering Their Judges', 'America's Corrupt Legal System', 'Foreign
Companies Face US Court Corruption: Doing Business in the Big Bribery Nation',
'FAQ on US Judicial and Legal Corruption', and reporting on how US intelligence
agencies spread hoaxes on Goog and Wikimedia. Legal actions underway in Europe
regarding the crimes to suppress me and my work - Google Inc facing sanctions
for its crimes of censorship, its violations of the human rights of dissidents
against the US.
Subject: Re: Dr. Richard
Cordero critiques JAIL4Judges Dear Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, * * Thank
you for your response to my email on 1) J.A.I.L. Paragraph 16 grand juries, and
2) my proposal to join forces with the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists to a) request that they apply their particular expertise in *"Follow
the money!"* investigations to expose judges’ financial wrongdoing; b) provoke
outrage in the national public; and c)cause the latter to force politicians,
under pain of not being elected or reelected, to investigate judges' financial
and non-financial wrongdoing and undertake judicial unaccountability and
discipline reform.
.jpg)
